Deep Research - موجّه تحليل بالذكاء الاصطناعي
Use this Li Lu rule prompt to apply “Deep Research” to a specific company. It turns a vague opinion into a repeatable checklist: what facts you must verify, which assumptions matter most, what would invalidate the thesis, and the common misreads that create false certainty. Expect a written output you can save: a thesis summary, key risks, and next-step questions for filings and earnings calls. If a claim matters, require primary-source citations before you act. Educational only — not investment advice.
الموجّه الكامل
أنت محلل استثماري مدرّب على مبدأ Li Lu: "Deep Research". مهمتك تحليل {اسم الشركة} من خلال هذا المنظور المحدد.
## السياق
يعلّم Li Lu: "Understand the business deeply before investing. Read everything available. Talk to customers and competitors."
## إطار التحليل
### 1. تقييم تطبيق المبدأ
- كيف ينطبق هذا المبدأ تحديداً على {اسم الشركة}؟
- ما جوانب الشركة الأكثر صلة بـ"Deep Research"؟
- قيّم التوافق: قوي / متوسط / ضعيف
- على ماذا سيركز Li Lu أولاً؟
### 2. الأدلة الكمية
- حدد 3-5 مؤشرات مالية رئيسية ذات صلة
- حلل هذه المؤشرات خلال السنوات 5-10 الماضية
- قارن مع المنافسين والمعايير التاريخية
- هل الأرقام تتحسن أم مستقرة أم تتدهور؟
### 3. التحليل النوعي
- قيّم العوامل غير القابلة للقياس التي سيفحصها Li Lu
- جودة الإدارة وتوافقها مع هذا المبدأ
- ديناميكيات الصناعة والموقف التنافسي
- استدامة نموذج الأعمال من هذا المنظور
### 4. تقييم المخاطر
- ما المخاطر التي يبرزها هذا المبدأ لـ{اسم الشركة}؟
- ما إشارات التحذير التي سيحددها Li Lu؟
- اختبار الضغط: كيف ستؤدي الشركة في ظروف معاكسة؟
- ما أسوأ سيناريو من منظور هذا المبدأ؟
### 5. تحديد الفرص
- ما الفرص التي يكشفها هذا التحليل؟
- هل هناك نقاط قوة مخفية قد يقلل السوق من قيمتها؟
- ما المحفزات التي قد تطلق القيمة؟
### 6. Li Lu Verdict
- هل تجتاز {اسم الشركة} اختبار "Deep Research"؟
- التقييم: 1-10
- توصية واضحة: شراء / احتفاظ / تجنب
- ملخص في فقرة واحدة
## تنسيق المخرجات
قدم بيانات محددة في كل قسم. اختم بحكم حاسم.Related reading (close the loop)
Pick one path below to turn the output into a checkable, repeatable decision policy.
- Read the matching principleDefinition, boundaries, pitfalls, and a minimal checklist.
- Master profileMethodology summary + common misreads for this framework.
- Practice in scenariosTranslate conclusions into “what I do under stress”.
- More prompts from this masterTriangulate with multiple rules instead of anchoring on one prompt.
Educational only. Verify facts with primary sources and apply your own constraints.
هذا المحتوى متاح حاليًا باللغتين الصينية والإنجليزية فقط.
Basic Questions
What specific steps does Li Lu's first-hand research method include?
Core idea: conducting extremely thorough first-hand research on investment targets
✅ Using this AI prompt, you can systematically analyze any company or investment opportunity from this principle's perspective.
The prompt guides you to:
1. Assess whether the investment target meets this principle's core requirements
2. Identify key risks and blind spots
3. Provide a 1-10 comprehensive rating
Start by analyzing companies you know well for practice, then apply the framework to new investment decisions.
✅ Using this AI prompt, you can systematically analyze any company or investment opportunity from this principle's perspective.
The prompt guides you to:
1. Assess whether the investment target meets this principle's core requirements
2. Identify key risks and blind spots
3. Provide a 1-10 comprehensive rating
Start by analyzing companies you know well for practice, then apply the framework to new investment decisions.
Usage Tips
Is the AI's 1-10 rating reliable?
⚠️ The rating is just the starting point of a deep research journey, not the destination.
The rating's value:
- Li Lu's deep research often takes months or years — AI scoring covers only the most superficial part
- The score helps determine research direction and priorities — which dimensions need deeper investigation
- Weaknesses exposed in the rating point to where you need further deep research
Key limitations:
- Li Lu's research depth includes face-to-face management meetings, site visits, supply chain research — none of which AI can do
- The core of deep research is forming 'unique insights,' not summarizing public information — AI excels at the latter
- True deep research requires significant time and effort investment — AI scoring only saves initial screening time
✅ Right approach: Use the AI score to quickly screen companies worth investigating deeply, then do the real work — reading annual reports, analyzing competitors, understanding industry dynamics. AI is a research assistant, not a research replacement.
The rating's value:
- Li Lu's deep research often takes months or years — AI scoring covers only the most superficial part
- The score helps determine research direction and priorities — which dimensions need deeper investigation
- Weaknesses exposed in the rating point to where you need further deep research
Key limitations:
- Li Lu's research depth includes face-to-face management meetings, site visits, supply chain research — none of which AI can do
- The core of deep research is forming 'unique insights,' not summarizing public information — AI excels at the latter
- True deep research requires significant time and effort investment — AI scoring only saves initial screening time
✅ Right approach: Use the AI score to quickly screen companies worth investigating deeply, then do the real work — reading annual reports, analyzing competitors, understanding industry dynamics. AI is a research assistant, not a research replacement.
Getting started
Does this prompt give investment advice or buy/sell calls?
No. It is a research helper that turns your thinking into checkable inputs and constraints: what evidence you must verify, what would prove the thesis wrong, and what common misreads to avoid. Treat the output as a draft, not a signal. Validate every material number against primary sources (filings, earnings releases, investor presentations, transcripts), and do not act unless you can write down (1) position-size limits and (2) explicit invalidation triggers.
What inputs should I provide for a reliable result?
At minimum: a 1-sentence business model summary, your current thesis (why it wins/loses), time horizon, and risk constraints; a valuation/price range; and the latest financial statements (profit quality, cash flow, debt/liquidity). Add context that reduces hallucinations: the exact filing period, known one-offs, key competitors, and what you do NOT know yet. If an input is missing, label it as missing evidence instead of letting the model guess.
Validation and boundaries
How do I validate the output?
Validate falsifiable claims one by one. Rewrite each key statement into something you can check: the metric, the period, and the source. Numbers must match filings; management claims must be traceable to transcripts/guidance; and “moat” claims need observable evidence (pricing power, retention, switching costs, cost structure). Anything you cannot verify becomes a follow-up task, not a decision trigger. If the model cites dates, confirm they are not beyond its knowledge cutoff.
When should I NOT act on the output?
If you cannot write down invalidation triggers, a position-size cap, or primary-source evidence for the key claims behind “Deep Research”, do not act. The safer move is usually to reduce size, slow down, and schedule the next review.
المزيد من موجّهات القواعد
استكشف مبادئ استثمارية أخرى من هذا المعلّم.
Circle of Competence
Stay within your circle of competence. Only invest in what you truly understand.
→China Opportunity
China represents one of the greatest investment opportunities of our time. Understand its unique dynamics.
→Owner Mentality
Think like an owner, not a trader. Would you want to own this entire business?
→Concentrated Portfolio
If you truly understand a business, concentrate. A few great investments beat many mediocre ones.
→