📖Jeremy Grantham

Identify Bubbles

🌳 Advanced★★★★★

Bubbles are recognizable before they burst.

💬

Bubbles are identifiable before they burst. Watch for valuations 2+ standard deviations above historical norms.

— GMO Quarterly Letters,2008

🏠 Everyday Analogy

Valuation is like buying a house: the asking price reflects mood, but true value comes from structure, location, and long-term utility. Good assets still need sensible prices.

📖 Core Interpretation

In Identify Bubbles, Jeremy Grantham focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves.
💎 Key Insight:Bubbles share common characteristics: extreme valuations (2+ standard deviations above historical norms), widespread public participation, compelling narratives that justify "this time is different," and parabolic price acceleration. Grantham identified the 2000 tech bubble, 2008 housing bubble, and recent bubbles well before they popped. The hard part is timing the exit and enduring ridicule.

AI Deep Analysis

Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation

❓ Why It Matters

Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong.

🎯 How to Practice

Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside.

🎙️ Master's Voice

Bubbles are best identified by credit excesses, not price excesses.
Grantham looks at credit expansion to identify bubbles. Excessive debt fueling asset prices is the danger sign.

⚔️ Practical Guide

✅ Decision Checklist

  • Is there credit excess?
  • Is debt fueling prices?
  • Are lending standards loose?

📋 Action Steps

  1. Monitor credit conditions
  2. Watch debt levels
  3. Identify credit excesses

🚨 Warning Signs

  • Excessive credit growth
  • Debt-fueled appreciation
  • Loose lending

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

Confusing a low price with true cheapness
Using one metric without business context
Overly optimistic assumptions that erase margin of safety

📚 Case Studies

1
Dot-Com Bubble Warning (2000)
Grantham publicly warned in 1998–2000 that tech stocks were in a massive bubble, reducing GMO client exposure to overvalued growth and internet shares.
✨ Outcome:Clients underperformed during the final surge, but avoided most of the 2000–2002 crash and preserved substantial capital.
2
Housing and Credit Bubble Call (2007)
Grantham labeled 2005–2007 a global housing and credit bubble, slashing exposure to risky mortgage-linked and leveraged financial assets before the crisis hit.
✨ Outcome:Underperformance before mid-2007, then strong relative results during the 2008 crash as portfolios were less exposed to collapsing financials.

See how masters handle real scenarios?

30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors

Explore Scenarios →