📖Julian Robertson
Conviction-Based Sizing
Size positions by conviction; best ideas deserve largest bets.
Size positions according to conviction level. Your best ideas deserve the largest allocations. Don't dilute your best ideas with too many positions.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Position size should reflect research depth and conviction level
💎 Key Insight：Robertson concentrated his portfolio in his highest-conviction ideas. If research shows a stock has exceptional potential with limited downside, size it appropriately large. Conversely, if confidence is low, keep the position small. This concentration strategy requires deep conviction backed by thorough research. Spreading capital equally across mediocre ideas dilutes returns.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Tiger would take 10%+ positions in high-conviction names
🎯 How to Practice
Rank ideas by conviction and allocate capital proportionally
🎙️ Master's Voice
The best ideas often come from your best analysts. Listen to them.
Robertson built a culture where analysts could challenge him and push their best ideas. He was not afraid to bet heavily on ideas from younger team members if their analysis was sound.
⚔️ Practical Guide
✅ Decision Checklist
- Am I open to ideas from others?
- Do I listen to dissenting views?
- Am I leveraging the insights of my network?
📋 Action Steps
- Build a network of smart analysts and investors
- Encourage others to share their best ideas
- Be willing to adopt ideas from any source
🚨 Warning Signs
- Not invented here syndrome
- Ignoring ideas from junior people
- Closed to outside perspectives
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Diversifying superficially without true risk balance
Skipping rebalancing rules and drifting style
Judging portfolio health by short-term returns only
📚 Case Studies
1
Shorting Overvalued Tech Stocks (1999)
Robertson sized up shorts in highly valued, unprofitable tech names, believing the late‑1990s dot‑com bubble was unsustainable.
✨ Outcome：Losses mounted as bubble inflated; redemptions and poor performance led him to close Tiger Management in 2000 despite later vindication.
2
Concentrated Bet on U.S. Financials (1997)
Convinced U.S. banks were undervalued after early‑1990s stress, he built large, concentrated positions in quality financial stocks.
✨ Outcome：Positions appreciated strongly as the economy expanded, reinforcing his philosophy of sizing up high‑conviction ideas rather than diversifying excessively.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →