📖David Swensen
Contrarian Thinking
Good investments often feel uncomfortable.
The best investments often feel uncomfortable because they go against popular opinion. If everyone loves a stock, it's probably overpriced. If everyone hates it, investigate.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
In Contrarian Thinking, David Swensen focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves.
💎 Key Insight：Popularity signals overvaluation; hatred signals opportunity.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong.
🎯 How to Practice
Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Confusing a low price with true cheapness
Using one metric without business context
Overly optimistic assumptions that erase margin of safety
📚 Case Studies
1
Dot‑Com Bust and Diversified Equity Exposure (2000)
Tech and growth stocks collapsed after the late‑1990s bubble, while broad value, international, and small‑cap exposures fared better.
✨ Outcome：Avoided concentrated tech bets, kept diversified long‑term allocations, and benefited as non‑bubble equities and later markets recovered.
2
Dot-Com Bubble Peak (2000)
Swensen’s Yale endowment policy rebalanced away from soaring U.S. growth stocks into underweighted bonds, real assets, and diversifiers as tech valuations became extreme.
✨ Outcome：Reduced drawdowns in 2000–2002 bear market and preserved capital to buy equities at cheaper prices.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →