📖George Soros
Inversion Thinking
Invert problems to find insights forward thinking misses.
Instead of asking how to succeed, ask how to avoid failure. Inverting problems often reveals insights that forward thinking misses.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
George Soros advocates a repeatable process: define criteria, execute consistently, and review decisions against evidence. Process quality drives outcome consistency.
💎 Key Insight：Avoiding failure is often more productive than pursuing success.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Without process, there is no reliable feedback loop. Structured execution and review improve decision quality over time.
🎯 How to Practice
Run a decision loop of research, thesis, execution, and post-mortem; document assumptions and update playbooks with evidence, not hindsight bias.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Having opinions without execution criteria
Reviewing outcomes but not decisions
Abandoning rules during volatility spikes
📚 Case Studies
1
Black Wednesday Short (1992)
Soros hypothesized the British pound could not stay in the ERM band and would be forced to devalue.
✨ Outcome：Built a massive short position against the pound; when devaluation hit, his fund reportedly profited about $1 billion.
2
Asian Financial Crisis Baht Bet (1997)
He hypothesized Thai authorities could not sustain the baht’s peg amid rising external debt and capital flight.
✨ Outcome：Short positions on the baht and related assets profited when Thailand devalued and regional markets sold off sharply.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →