📖Benjamin Graham

Price-to-Book Criterion

🌿 Intermediate★★★★☆

Use price-to-book as a value screen for safety. Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong. Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside. In Price-to-Book Criterion, Benjamin Graham focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves. Key insight: Low price-to-book ratios provide a margin of safety based on assets.

Avoid misuse: Confusing a low price with true cheapness

💬

Current price should not be more than 1.5 times the book value last reported. A moderately low ratio of price to book value is another criterion for the defensive investor.

— _The Intelligent Investor_，1949

🏠 Everyday Analogy

Valuation is like buying a house: the asking price reflects mood, but true value comes from structure, location, and long-term utility. Good assets still need sensible prices.

📖 Core Interpretation

In Price-to-Book Criterion, Benjamin Graham focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves.
💎 Key Insight：Low price-to-book ratios provide a margin of safety based on assets.

AI Deep Analysis

Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation

❓ Why It Matters

Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong.

🎯 How to Practice

Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside.

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

✕Confusing a low price with true cheapness
✕Using one metric without business context
✕Overly optimistic assumptions that erase margin of safety

📚 Case Studies

1
Avoiding High P/E Growth Darlings (2011)
During the run-up in popular momentum stocks, Graham-style investors rejected high P/E names such as Netflix and Salesforce based on earnings multiples far above the P/E standard.
✨ Outcome：Avoided sharp drawdowns in subsequent corrections while owning cheaper, steadier businesses that delivered superior risk-adjusted returns.
2
Post-Crisis Bank Recovery (2009)
Large U.S. bank traded below book value after 2008 crisis. Graham-style investors screened for strong capital ratios and consistent earnings history despite temporary losses.
✨ Outcome：Bought at ~0.5x P/B; as credit fears eased, valuation moved toward book, producing strong multi‑year gains.

📌 Save this principle as your rule

One click to drop it into your personal rule library — every future trade will be scored against it.

See how masters handle real scenarios?

30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors

Explore Scenarios →