📖Jeremy Grantham
Multidisciplinary Thinking
Use insights from multiple disciplines for better decisions.
Draw insights from multiple disciplines — psychology, history, mathematics, and science — to build a lattice of mental models for better investment decisions.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Jeremy Grantham highlights that many investment mistakes are psychological, not analytical. Managing behavior under stress is as important as finding ideas.
💎 Key Insight：Cross-disciplinary thinking reveals patterns invisible to specialists.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
In volatile markets, fear and greed push investors to buy high and sell low. A behavioral framework reduces avoidable, self-inflicted errors.
🎯 How to Practice
Pre-write decision rules, slow down trades during stress, and separate market emotion from business facts before adjusting positions.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Following crowd emotion at extremes
Mistaking confidence for certainty
Forcing trades to quickly recover losses
📚 Case Studies
1
Agricultural Commodity Tightness (2011)
Extreme weather, rising emerging‑market diets, and constrained arable land triggered sharp rises in grain and food prices, consistent with Grantham’s resource‑scarcity framework.
✨ Outcome：Ag, fertilizer, and farmland investments outperformed; volatility later normalized, but structural pressure on food systems remained evident to long‑term investors.
2
Dot-Com Bubble Restraint (1999)
Grantham avoided overvalued tech stocks despite client pressure and soaring Nasdaq indices, focusing on valuation discipline.
✨ Outcome：Underperformed during the mania, then strongly outperformed after the 2000–2002 crash as overpriced tech collapsed.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →