📖Jeremy Grantham
Review Your Investment Thesis
Regularly challenge your original investment thesis.
Regularly review whether your original reasons for owning a stock still hold. If the facts change, change your mind. Holding a broken thesis is the costliest mistake.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Jeremy Grantham frames investing as a compounding game. Time amplifies quality and discipline, while unnecessary activity often destroys long-horizon returns.
💎 Key Insight：Adapting to new facts prevents holding broken investments.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Short-term noise often forces investors out before value is realized. Long-term discipline increases the odds that fundamentals, not emotions, drive outcomes.
🎯 How to Practice
Extend research and review horizon, reduce unnecessary turnover, and adjust only when intrinsic value, risk, or opportunity cost materially changes.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Calling it long term while never reviewing thesis
Overtrading and damaging compounding
Ignoring opportunity cost and alternatives
📚 Case Studies
1
U.S. Housing and Credit Bubble (2007)
Grantham highlighted extreme overvaluation in U.S. housing and risk assets, cutting exposure to equities and credit pre-crisis.
✨ Outcome：GMO avoided the worst of the 2008 collapse and then added risk as spreads and equity valuations reverted toward historical averages.
2
Dot-Com Bubble Warning (2000)
Grantham publicly warned in 1998–2000 that tech stocks were in a massive bubble, reducing GMO client exposure to overvalued growth and internet shares.
✨ Outcome：Clients underperformed during the final surge, but avoided most of the 2000–2002 crash and preserved substantial capital.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →