📖John Neff
Management Evaluation
Judge management by actions, not words.
Evaluate management by their actions, not their words. Look for a track record of capital allocation, shareholder communication, and aligned incentives.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
In Management Evaluation, John Neff focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves.
💎 Key Insight：Track record reveals true management quality.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong.
🎯 How to Practice
Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Confusing a low price with true cheapness
Using one metric without business context
Overly optimistic assumptions that erase margin of safety
📚 Case Studies
1
Ford Motor Turnaround (1974)
During the 1973–74 bear market, Ford traded at a very low P/E as auto demand slumped. Neff bought heavily, believing earnings would normalize when recession and oil-shock fears eased.
✨ Outcome：Within several years, Ford rebounded sharply, delivering substantial gains and validating the low P/E contrarian bet.
2
General Electric Revaluation (1982)
Early 1980s recession fears pushed GE’s P/E below market averages despite solid cash flows and strong business franchises. Neff accumulated shares, expecting profit growth to resume with economic recovery.
✨ Outcome：As earnings and confidence improved through the 1980s, GE’s stock and valuation rose, producing significant outperformance.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →