📖John Neff
Multidisciplinary Thinking
Use insights from multiple disciplines for better decisions.
Draw insights from multiple disciplines — psychology, history, mathematics, and science — to build a lattice of mental models for better investment decisions.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
John Neff highlights that many investment mistakes are psychological, not analytical. Managing behavior under stress is as important as finding ideas.
💎 Key Insight：Cross-disciplinary thinking reveals patterns invisible to specialists.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
In volatile markets, fear and greed push investors to buy high and sell low. A behavioral framework reduces avoidable, self-inflicted errors.
🎯 How to Practice
Pre-write decision rules, slow down trades during stress, and separate market emotion from business facts before adjusting positions.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Following crowd emotion at extremes
Mistaking confidence for certainty
Forcing trades to quickly recover losses
📚 Case Studies
1
Ford Motor Recession Bargain (1973)
During the 1973–74 bear market, Neff bought Ford at a low P/E when auto demand slumped and sentiment was extremely negative.
✨ Outcome：As the economy recovered, Ford’s earnings rebounded and the stock price rose several-fold over the following years.
2
Chevron Energy Cycle Investment (1982)
In the early 1980s energy downturn, Neff accumulated Chevron at a discounted valuation while oil prices and profits were depressed.
✨ Outcome：When energy prices stabilized and improved, Chevron’s earnings strengthened and the stock delivered strong total returns for his fund.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →