📖John Neff
Process-Oriented Investing
Good process outperforms lucky outcomes over time.
Focus on process, not outcomes. A good process can produce bad outcomes in the short run, but will generate superior results over time.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
John Neff sees markets as cyclical rather than linear. Understanding cycle position improves risk-taking decisions more than trying to call exact tops and bottoms.
💎 Key Insight：Process discipline is more reliable than chasing results.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Ignoring cycles repeats the same mistakes: excessive optimism at peaks and excessive pessimism near troughs. Context matters for position sizing.
🎯 How to Practice
Monitor credit, valuation, earnings, and sentiment signals; reduce aggressiveness in euphoric phases and preserve flexibility in fearful phases.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Treating short rebounds as full cycle turns
Extrapolating peak conditions indefinitely
Becoming maximally defensive near valuation troughs
📚 Case Studies
1
Cyclicals After Recession Fears (1990)
During early-1990s slowdown, Neff accumulated beaten‑down cyclical stocks while many investors fled to safety, focusing on solid balance sheets and dividend support.
✨ Outcome：As the economy recovered, these holdings outperformed the market over subsequent years, rewarding long‑term patience.
2
Oil Shock Recession (1973)
Neff bought undervalued cyclical stocks hit by 1973–74 bear market, emphasizing low P/E and strong cash flows despite recession fears.
✨ Outcome：Portfolio declined less than market and rebounded strongly as earnings normalized, demonstrating focus on downside protection via valuation.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →