📖Julian Robertson
Sell Discipline Rules
Follow pre-defined sell criteria without emotion.
Have clear, pre-defined sell criteria. Sell when: your thesis is broken, valuation is fully realized, or a significantly better opportunity appears.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Julian Robertson advocates a repeatable process: define criteria, execute consistently, and review decisions against evidence. Process quality drives outcome consistency.
💎 Key Insight：Disciplined selling prevents emotional decision-making.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Without process, there is no reliable feedback loop. Structured execution and review improve decision quality over time.
🎯 How to Practice
Run a decision loop of research, thesis, execution, and post-mortem; document assumptions and update playbooks with evidence, not hindsight bias.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Having opinions without execution criteria
Reviewing outcomes but not decisions
Abandoning rules during volatility spikes
📚 Case Studies
1
Tech Bubble Avoidance (1999)
Robertson avoided overvalued dot-com stocks, shorting some high-flyers and owning fundamentally strong, cash-generative businesses instead.
✨ Outcome：Underperformed during the late-stage bubble but delivered superior risk-adjusted returns after the 2000–2002 tech crash as speculative names collapsed.
2
Tiger vs. Tech Bubble (1998)
Robertson shorted overvalued tech stocks and stayed long fundamental value names while the dot-com bubble inflated, causing sharp underperformance.
✨ Outcome：Massive redemptions and losses forced Tiger Management to close in 2000, despite the bubble bursting soon after and vindicating his thesis.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →