📖Charlie Munger

Long-term Holding

🌳 Advanced★★★★★

The ideal holding period for a great business is forever — trading destroys wealth.

💬

Our favorite holding period is forever.

— Berkshire Hathaway Letter to Shareholders，1988

🏠 Everyday Analogy

Just like nurturing a good tree, you wouldn’t cut it down simply because it grows slowly this year—you wait for it to grow into a towering tree. Frequently buying and selling stocks is like constantly replacing saplings: you’ll never see them blossom and bear fruit, while pointlessly wasting the cost of replanting.

📖 Core Interpretation

Truly sound investments should be held for the long term, as transaction costs and taxes can severely erode returns.
💎 Key Insight：Every trade incurs taxes, fees, and the risk of selling a future winner. Munger's "sit on your ass" philosophy means finding great businesses and then doing nothing. The less you trade, the less you pay in friction costs, and the more you benefit from compound growth. Activity feels productive but is usually destructive in investing.

AI Deep Analysis

Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation

❓ Why It Matters

Compounding requires time; frequent trading is its enemy.

🎯 How to Practice

When making a purchase, assume it cannot be sold—only invest in businesses you would be willing to hold permanently.

🎙️ Master's Voice

Understanding both the power of compound return and the difficulty of getting it is the heart of understanding a lot of things.
Munger emphasizes that compounding is easy to understand but hard to achieve. The difficulty lies in patience and avoiding interruptions.

⚔️ Practical Guide

✅ Decision Checklist

  • Am I letting compounding work?
  • Am I interrupting the process?
  • Is my timeline long enough?

📋 Action Steps

  1. Calculate long-term compound scenarios
  2. Minimize actions that interrupt compounding
  3. Extend your investment horizon

🚨 Warning Signs

  • Frequent trading
  • Short time horizons
  • Impatience with slow growth

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

✕Not all investments are suitable for permanent holding.
✕When a company's fundamentals deteriorate, exit decisively.

📚 Case Studies

1
Buffett’s Early Purchase of American Express (1964)
In 1964, amid the “salad oil scandal,” American Express stock crashed as investors feared massive fraud-related losses. Warren Buffett studied the business, concluded the brand and charge-card franchise remained strong, and invested about 40% of his partnership’s capital in the company despite short-term uncertainty.
✨ Outcome：Within a few years, the stock multiplied, validating his conviction. Decades later, Berkshire Hathaway still holds a huge AmEx stake, showing how long-term ownership of a durable franchise can produce extraordinary compounded returns and tax efficiency.
2
Berkshire’s Long-Term Stake in Coca-Cola (1988)
In 1988–1989, after Coca-Cola’s 1987 crash and restructuring, Buffett bought roughly $1.3 billion of Coke stock, about 6–7% of the company. He saw a simple, global consumer franchise with enduring brand power and predictable economics, not a quick trade or cyclical play.
✨ Outcome：By the late 1990s, the stake was worth over $10 billion, and Berkshire has largely held it ever since. Annual dividends now exceed Berkshire’s original cost, illustrating how a ‘forever’ holding period magnifies the benefits of compounding in elite businesses.

See how masters handle real scenarios?

30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors

Explore Scenarios →