📖Charlie Munger
Review Mistakes Honestly
Honest review of failures improves future decisions.
I like people admitting they were complete stupid horses' asses. I know I'll perform better if I rub my nose in my mistakes. This is a wonderful trick to learn.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Charlie Munger advocates a repeatable process: define criteria, execute consistently, and review decisions against evidence. Process quality drives outcome consistency.
💎 Key Insight：Acknowledging mistakes is the fastest path to improvement.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Without process, there is no reliable feedback loop. Structured execution and review improve decision quality over time.
🎯 How to Practice
Run a decision loop of research, thesis, execution, and post-mortem; document assumptions and update playbooks with evidence, not hindsight bias.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Having opinions without execution criteria
Reviewing outcomes but not decisions
Abandoning rules during volatility spikes
📚 Case Studies
1
Housing Market and Bank Stocks (2008)
Investor believed 'real estate always goes up' and that banks were safe due to diversification, buying highly leveraged financials before the crisis.
✨ Outcome：Severe losses as housing collapsed and bank shares plunged or were diluted, showing dangers of one-factor thinking and ignoring leverage and downside risk.
2
Enron Collapse (2001)
Analysts and auditors praised Enron’s innovation and accounting, so many investors trusted their authority and ignored red flags in opaque financial statements.
✨ Outcome：Stock went to zero; investors suffered total loss, illustrating dangers of overtrusting experts and conflicted gatekeepers.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →