📖Benjamin Graham

P/E Ratio Standard

🌳 Advanced★★★★★

Limit stock purchases to those trading at no more than 15 times their three-year average earnings.

💬

The current price should not be more than 15 times average earnings of the past three years.

— _The Intelligent Investor_，1949

🏠 Everyday Analogy

Just as one would consider the price-to-income ratio when buying a house, if a property's annual rental income is only 1/15 of its price, then the house is too expensive. Similarly, when a stock's price-to-earnings ratio exceeds 15 times, it is like purchasing an overpriced house that would take 15 years to recoup the investment—carrying excessive risk.

📖 Core Interpretation

The stock price should not exceed 15 times the average earnings of the past three years.
💎 Key Insight：Graham's PE ceiling of 15x average earnings provides a mechanical safeguard against overpaying. Using a three-year average smooths out cyclical fluctuations and one-time events. This standard automatically excludes popular growth stocks with inflated multiples, keeping the investor focused on proven value rather than projected potential.

AI Deep Analysis

Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation

❓ Why It Matters

A low price-to-earnings ratio provides a margin of safety, while a high price-to-earnings ratio carries greater risk.

🎯 How to Practice

Calculate the price-to-earnings ratio using the average earnings of the past three years, and identify stocks with a P/E ratio below 15.

🎙️ Master's Voice

An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return.
Graham defined investment precisely: thorough analysis, safety of principal, adequate return. Anything else was speculation.

⚔️ Practical Guide

✅ Decision Checklist

  • Have I done thorough analysis?
  • Is my principal safe?
  • Is the return adequate?

📋 Action Steps

  1. Apply Graham's three tests
  2. Distinguish investing from speculation
  3. Ensure all three criteria are met

🚨 Warning Signs

  • Speculation disguised as investing
  • Inadequate analysis
  • Principal at risk

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

✕This standard may be too stringent for modern markets.
✕Adjust according to the interest rate environment.

📚 Case Studies

1
Post-Dot-Com Recovery Screen (2002)
Applied Graham’s P/E below 15 and earnings stability rules to large-cap industrials after the dot-com bust, avoiding high-tech names still trading at extreme multiples.
✨ Outcome：Selected undervalued firms like Caterpillar and 3M, which outperformed the S&P 500 over the next five years.
2
Avoiding High P/E Growth Darlings (2011)
During the run-up in popular momentum stocks, Graham-style investors rejected high P/E names such as Netflix and Salesforce based on earnings multiples far above the P/E standard.
✨ Outcome：Avoided sharp drawdowns in subsequent corrections while owning cheaper, steadier businesses that delivered superior risk-adjusted returns.

See how masters handle real scenarios?

30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors

Explore Scenarios →