📖Jeremy Grantham

Quality Stocks

🌳 Advanced★★★★★

Quality stocks outperform with lower risk.

💬

High-quality stocks with strong balance sheets outperform over time with less risk.

— GMO Quarterly Letters,2016

🏠 Everyday Analogy

Risk control is like a seatbelt. It does not make the ride faster, but it keeps you alive when conditions suddenly turn against you.

📖 Core Interpretation

Jeremy Grantham treats survival as the first objective. Limiting permanent capital loss, controlling leverage, and avoiding single-point failure are prerequisites for long-term compounding.
💎 Key Insight:High-quality companies—strong balance sheets, stable earnings, high returns on equity—deliver better risk-adjusted returns than junk. They decline less in bear markets and compound steadily over time. Quality is especially valuable late in economic cycles when fragile companies break. GMO's quality strategies have consistently beaten benchmarks with lower volatility.

AI Deep Analysis

Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation

❓ Why It Matters

A single large drawdown can erase years of progress. Risk control is not timidity; it is the operating system that keeps compounding alive.

🎯 How to Practice

Define downside scenarios before entry, cap position size, avoid fragile leverage, and maintain liquidity so mistakes remain survivable.

🎙️ Master's Voice

The duty of the value manager is to be early and to be there when it turns.
Grantham accepts that value investing means being early. The goal is to be positioned when mean reversion occurs.

⚔️ Practical Guide

✅ Decision Checklist

  • Am I prepared to be early?
  • Will I be there when it turns?
  • Can I endure waiting?

📋 Action Steps

  1. Accept being early
  2. Stay positioned
  3. Endure the wait

🚨 Warning Signs

  • Abandoning positions
  • Giving up too early
  • Missing the turn

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

Equating volatility with all forms of risk
Oversized positions without an exit plan
Using leverage to compensate for uncertainty

📚 Case Studies

1
Avoiding the Dot-Com Bubble (1999)
Grantham refused to chase tech and internet stocks despite underperforming peers during the late-1990s mania.
✨ Outcome:Clients owning quality, reasonably valued stocks avoided catastrophic losses when the bubble burst in 2000–2002.
2
High-Quality Stocks in the GFC (2008)
During the Global Financial Crisis, Grantham emphasized financially strong, high-quality companies over leveraged or speculative names.
✨ Outcome:Quality stocks fell less than the market and rebounded faster, preserving capital and compounding strongly in the recovery.

See how masters handle real scenarios?

30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors

Explore Scenarios →