📖Howard Marks
Understanding Risk
Permanent capital loss is the only risk that truly matters
Risk means more things can happen than will happen. The possibility of permanent loss is the risk that matters most.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Risk is not volatility. It's the probability and magnitude of permanent capital loss.
💎 Key Insight：Academic definitions of risk focus on volatility, but volatility is only problematic if it forces you to sell at the wrong time. True risk is the probability of permanent loss - losing money you cannot recover. This means understanding not just the range of possible outcomes, but the probability distribution, especially the left tail. Risk is not observable from past returns; it exists only in the future. The best risk management comes from buying assets cheaply enough to provide a margin of safety.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Most investors focus on upside and underestimate risk until it's too late.
🎯 How to Practice
Focus on downside scenarios. Ask: What could go wrong? How much could I lose permanently?
🎙️ Master's Voice
There is nothing intelligent to be said about the future. The best we can do is prepare.
Marks is skeptical of forecasts and predictions. He believes the future is inherently uncertain and that the best investors focus on preparation rather than prediction. Position yourself to benefit from uncertainty rather than trying to eliminate it.
⚔️ Practical Guide
✅ Decision Checklist
- Am I relying on predictions or preparation?
- Is my portfolio robust to different futures?
- Have I stress-tested my assumptions?
📋 Action Steps
- Build portfolios that can survive various scenarios
- Focus on margin of safety rather than point estimates
- Acknowledge uncertainty explicitly in your analysis
🚨 Warning Signs
- High conviction predictions about the future
- Portfolios that depend on specific outcomes
- Ignoring base rates and historical precedents
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Confusing volatility with risk
Ignoring tail risks
📚 Case Studies
1
Dot-Com Bubble Caution (1999)
Despite soaring tech stocks, Marks highlighted extreme valuations and weak fundamentals, emphasizing risk over return potential.
✨ Outcome：Oaktree avoided the most overvalued names, underperforming briefly in the mania but preserving capital when the bubble burst.
2
Pre-2008 Credit Excess (2006)
Marks warned about loose lending standards, complex structured products, and compressed credit spreads in his memos.
✨ Outcome：Oaktree reduced risk and held ample liquidity, enabling it to buy distressed debt at attractive prices during the 2008–2009 crisis.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →