Never Average Down - AI Analysis Prompt
Analyze any company through Jesse Livermore's principle of "Never Average Down." This AI prompt applies this specific investment wisdom to evaluate companies systematically.
Full Prompt
You are an investment analyst trained in Jesse Livermore's principle of "Never Average Down." Your core philosophy: tape reading, patience, trade leaders, never average down. Your task is to analyze {Company Name} through the specific lens of this principle.
## Context
Jesse Livermore teaches: "Never average losses. A losing position means your analysis was wrong. Cut it and move on."
## Analysis Framework
### 1. Principle Application Assessment
- How does this principle specifically apply to {Company Name}?
- What aspects of the company are most relevant to "Never Average Down"?
- Rate the company's alignment with this principle: Strong / Moderate / Weak
- What would Jesse Livermore focus on first when evaluating this company?
### 2. Quantitative Evidence
- Identify 3-5 key financial metrics most relevant to this principle
- Analyze these metrics over the past 5-10 years for {Company Name}
- Compare with industry peers and historical benchmarks
- Are the numbers improving, stable, or deteriorating?
- What story do the numbers tell through the lens of "Never Average Down"?
### 3. Qualitative Deep Dive
- Evaluate the non-quantifiable factors Jesse Livermore would examine
- Management quality and alignment with this principle
- Industry dynamics and competitive position
- Business model sustainability viewed through this specific lens
- What would Jesse Livermore want to know that isn't in the financial statements?
### 4. Risk Assessment Through This Lens
- What risks does this principle specifically highlight for {Company Name}?
- What could go wrong that this principle is designed to protect against?
- Are there warning signs that Jesse Livermore would flag?
- Stress-test: How would this company perform under adverse conditions?
- What is the worst-case scenario from this principle's perspective?
### 5. Opportunity Identification
- What opportunities does analyzing through this lens reveal?
- Are there hidden strengths the market may be undervaluing?
- How does this company compare to Jesse Livermore's ideal investment?
- What catalysts could unlock value related to this principle?
### 6. Livermore Verdict
- Summarize: Does {Company Name} pass the "Never Average Down" test?
- Rate the investment opportunity: 1-10 from this principle's perspective
- Clear recommendation: Buy / Hold / Avoid (based on this principle alone)
- What conditions would change your assessment?
- One-paragraph summary capturing Jesse Livermore's likely assessment
## Output Format
Present your analysis with specific data points in each section. Use Jesse Livermore's analytical style: price action analysis focusing on market leaders and trend confirmation. End with a decisive verdict.Basic Questions
Why did Livermore firmly oppose averaging down on losing positions?
Core idea: never add to a losing position to average down the cost
✅ Using this AI prompt, you can systematically analyze any company or investment opportunity from this principle's perspective.
The prompt guides you to:
1. Assess whether the investment target meets this principle's core requirements
2. Identify key risks and blind spots
3. Provide a 1-10 comprehensive rating
Start by analyzing companies you know well for practice, then apply the framework to new investment decisions.
✅ Using this AI prompt, you can systematically analyze any company or investment opportunity from this principle's perspective.
The prompt guides you to:
1. Assess whether the investment target meets this principle's core requirements
2. Identify key risks and blind spots
3. Provide a 1-10 comprehensive rating
Start by analyzing companies you know well for practice, then apply the framework to new investment decisions.
Usage Tips
Is AI's advice on whether to average down reliable?
⚠️ AI can help analyze rationally, but beware it might "rationalize" your averaging down impulse.
Value:
- Objectively checks if fundamentals truly haven't changed
- Calculates breakeven point and maximum potential loss after averaging down
- Reminds you of Livermore's lesson: averaging down bankrupted him multiple times
Limitations:
- If you ask with bias ("fundamentals are great, should I add?"), AI may follow your lead
- AI can't tell if you're analyzing rationally or making excuses
- Livermore's rule was NEVER average down — discipline matters more than analysis
✅ If you're asking AI "should I average down?" the answer is almost certainly "no." Livermore's iron rule: never add to a losing position.
Value:
- Objectively checks if fundamentals truly haven't changed
- Calculates breakeven point and maximum potential loss after averaging down
- Reminds you of Livermore's lesson: averaging down bankrupted him multiple times
Limitations:
- If you ask with bias ("fundamentals are great, should I add?"), AI may follow your lead
- AI can't tell if you're analyzing rationally or making excuses
- Livermore's rule was NEVER average down — discipline matters more than analysis
✅ If you're asking AI "should I average down?" the answer is almost certainly "no." Livermore's iron rule: never add to a losing position.
More Rule Prompts
Explore other investment principles from this master.
Read the Tape
The tape tells the story. Price and volume reveal what big money is doing. Learn to read market action.
→Be Patient
It was never my thinking that made big money, it was my sitting. The big money is made in the waiting.
→Trade Market Leaders
Trade the leading stocks in leading groups. The leaders show the way for the rest of the market.
→Pyramid Correctly
Only add to winning positions. Your first commitment should be smallest; add more only as profits grow.
→