What the Masters Would Say
Cryptocurrency represents one of the most polarizing investment topics of our era, and the perspectives of legendary value investors provide valuable framework for thinking about this novel asset class. Their skepticism is rooted not in technophobia but in fundamental investment principles that have proven reliable across centuries of financial history.
Warren Buffett has been consistently critical of cryptocurrency, calling Bitcoin "rat poison squared" and stating that he would not buy all the Bitcoin in the world for $25. His reasoning is characteristically clear: Bitcoin produces no earnings, no dividends, no products, and no services. Its value depends entirely on finding someone willing to pay more for it in the future -- what economists call the "greater fool" theory. Buffett evaluates investments based on their productive capacity, and by this measure, cryptocurrency produces nothing.
Charlie Munger has been even more blunt, calling cryptocurrency "disgusting and contrary to the interests of civilization." While this rhetoric is extreme, Munger's underlying point is substantive: currencies derive their value from the trust and stability provided by sovereign governments and central banks. Cryptocurrencies operate outside this framework, making their long-term value proposition uncertain.
However, it is important to note that Buffett and Munger's framework was designed for productive assets -- businesses that generate cash flow. Cryptocurrency is a different category entirely, more analogous to gold, art, or other non-productive stores of value. Their criticism is valid within their framework but may not capture the full picture.
Howard Marks offers the most balanced perspective among prominent investors. He acknowledges that blockchain technology may have genuine utility and that some cryptocurrencies could survive long-term. But he emphasizes that the current cryptocurrency market is characterized by extreme speculation, manipulation, and prices disconnected from any fundamental value. The lack of a reliable valuation framework makes it impossible to determine whether any cryptocurrency is cheap or expensive.
The position sizing question is critical. Even investors who are bullish on cryptocurrency should recognize the extreme volatility and uncertainty. A 1-5% allocation to cryptocurrency allows you to participate in potential upside while limiting the damage if the investment goes to zero. Investing more than 5% of your portfolio in an asset with no intrinsic value and 80%+ historical drawdowns is speculation, not investment.
Your Action Plan
The wisest approach is to build your core portfolio on time-tested principles and productive assets, and limit speculative positions like cryptocurrency to a small percentage that will not affect your financial future either way.
Citation Traceability
- Canonical URL: https://keeprule.com/en/scenarios/should-i-invest-in-cryptocurrency
- Language Served: en (requested: en)
- Last Updated: 2026-02-13
Want Deeper Analysis?
Copy this scenario as an AI prompt. Paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for personalized analysis
Explore More Scenarios
Browse all 30 investing dilemmas and discover what legendary investors would do in each situation.
View All Scenarios