investment-fundamentals

What Is Dollar-Cost Averaging and Does It Actually Work?

Hearing about dollar-cost averaging everywhere — wondering if it is a real strategy or just a cliché

What the Masters Would Say

Dollar-cost averaging is one of the most powerful and underappreciated strategies in investing. The concept is simple: invest a fixed amount of money at regular intervals regardless of market conditions. But the simplicity masks profound wisdom about human psychology and market behavior.

Benjamin Graham was the original advocate of dollar-cost averaging, which he called "formula investing." He recommended it specifically because it removes the most dangerous element from the investment process: the investor's own emotions. When you invest automatically on a schedule, you cannot panic-sell during crashes or greed-buy during bubbles. The system overrides the psychology.

The mathematical advantage is significant. When you invest a fixed dollar amount each month, you automatically buy more shares when prices are low and fewer shares when prices are high. This naturally lowers your average cost per share over time. It is the mathematical opposite of what emotional investors do -- they buy most when prices are high (because confidence is high) and buy least when prices are low (because fear is dominant).

Warren Buffett has endorsed dollar-cost averaging repeatedly, especially for individual investors who are not professional analysts. His logic is practical: most investors have income that arrives monthly. Waiting to accumulate a large lump sum before investing means sitting in cash while the market historically goes up roughly 70% of all years. The opportunity cost of waiting exceeds the potential benefit of timing.

Peter Lynch reinforces this with historical data: more money has been lost by investors waiting for corrections than in the corrections themselves. Dollar-cost averaging eliminates this problem entirely because you invest regardless of what the market is doing.

Charlie Munger offers an important caveat: if you have a lump sum available today and a long time horizon, the mathematical expectation favors investing it all immediately rather than spreading it out. Historically, lump-sum investing beats dollar-cost averaging roughly 65-70% of the time because markets tend to go up. However, dollar-cost averaging is psychologically superior because the regret of investing a lump sum right before a crash is devastating and often leads to permanent behavior changes.

Here is how to implement dollar-cost averaging effectively:

Your Action Plan

1. Set up automatic monthly transfers from your bank account to your brokerage account on the day you receive your paycheck. Automation removes the temptation to skip months when markets feel scary.
2. Choose a single low-cost index fund or a small number of high-conviction positions. Dollar-cost averaging works best with broad diversification.
3. Never skip a month regardless of market conditions. The entire power of the strategy comes from consistency. Skipping months during crashes is precisely the behavior the strategy is designed to prevent.
4. Increase your contribution amount annually, ideally by at least the percentage of any raise you receive. This creates an accelerating wealth-building effect.
5. Review your portfolio quarterly but only change your contribution schedule when your life circumstances change -- never in response to market conditions.

Dollar-cost averaging is not the mathematically optimal strategy -- lump-sum investing is. But it is the psychologically optimal strategy, and psychology determines your actual returns far more than mathematics.

Citation Traceability

  • Canonical URL: https://keeprule.com/en/scenarios/what-is-dollar-cost-averaging-does-it-work
  • Language Served: en (requested: en)
  • Last Updated: 2026-02-12
🤖

Want Deeper Analysis?

Copy this scenario as an AI prompt. Paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for personalized analysis

Explore More Scenarios

Browse all 30 investing dilemmas and discover what legendary investors would do in each situation.

View All Scenarios