📖Warren Buffett
One Dollar Test
Every dollar retained by a company should create at least one dollar of market value.
Every dollar of retained earnings should create at least one dollar of market value.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Testing whether management can allocate capital effectively: For every dollar of profit retained by the company, its market value should increase by at least one dollar.
💎 Key Insight:This simple test separates great capital allocators from value destroyers. If management retains $1 billion over five years but market cap only rises $500 million, they're wasting your money. Look for companies where retained earnings compound faster than the market average — it's proof of a genuine competitive advantage.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
If a company retains profits but its market value does not increase, it indicates inefficient capital allocation. It would be better to distribute dividends to shareholders.
🎯 How to Practice
Calculation Method: Compare the total retained earnings over the past 5-10 years with the increase in market capitalization. Ideally, the ratio should exceed 1:1.
🎙️ Master's Voice
Unrestricted earnings should be retained only when there is a reasonable prospect—backed preferably by historical evidence—that for every dollar retained, at least one dollar of market value will be created.
Buffett applies this test rigorously. If a company can't create $1 of value for every $1 retained, it should return the money to shareholders. This explains why Berkshire never paid a dividend—Buffett created far more than $1 of value per $1 retained over decades.
⚔️ Practical Guide
✅ Decision Checklist
- Is management creating value with retained earnings?
- What is the return on retained earnings?
- Should the company return capital instead of retaining?
- Has historical retention created value?
📋 Action Steps
- Track change in market value vs. retained earnings
- Calculate 5-year return on retained capital
- Compare reinvestment returns to alternatives
- Favor companies with high-return reinvestment
🚨 Warning Signs
- Retaining earnings without creating value
- Poor returns on reinvested capital
- Empire building with shareholder funds
- Holding cash without a plan
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
All companies should retain earnings - only those capable of effectively utilizing capital should do so.
Dividends are not inherently good - high dividends may indicate a lack of attractive investment opportunities.
📚 Case Studies
1
Berkshire Hathaway (1984)
Almost no dividends are paid, but capital allocation efficiency is extremely high.
✨ Outcome:Each dollar retained created more than one dollar in market value.
2
Companies in Declining Industries (1984)
Retained Earnings Invested in Low-Return Projects
✨ Outcome:The increase in market value is significantly lower than the retained earnings; it would be better to distribute dividends.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →