📖Jeremy Grantham
Patient Contrarianism
Being early costs you in the short run.
Being early is the same as being wrong. But in the long run, fundamentals always win.
🏠 Everyday Analogy
📖 Core Interpretation
Jeremy Grantham frames investing as a compounding game. Time amplifies quality and discipline, while unnecessary activity often destroys long-horizon returns.
💎 Key Insight：Bubbles can persist longer than seems rational. Exiting early means missing the final parabolic stage, which can be the most profitable (and dangerous). Clients fire managers who underperform during bubble peaks. Grantham was early on the tech bubble and lost assets. But in the long run, fundamentals reassert themselves. Being right eventually matters more than being right immediately.
AI Deep Analysis
Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation
❓ Why It Matters
Short-term noise often forces investors out before value is realized. Long-term discipline increases the odds that fundamentals, not emotions, drive outcomes.
🎯 How to Practice
Extend research and review horizon, reduce unnecessary turnover, and adjust only when intrinsic value, risk, or opportunity cost materially changes.
🎙️ Master's Voice
Everything reverts to the mean.
Grantham built his career on mean reversion. Extreme valuations eventually normalize, creating opportunities.
⚔️ Practical Guide
✅ Decision Checklist
- Is this extreme?
- What is the mean?
- When will reversion occur?
📋 Action Steps
- Identify extremes
- Know historical averages
- Position for reversion
🚨 Warning Signs
- Ignoring mean reversion
- Assuming extremes persist
- No historical context
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
Calling it long term while never reviewing thesis
Overtrading and damaging compounding
Ignoring opportunity cost and alternatives
📚 Case Studies
1
Dot-Com Bubble Avoidance (1999)
Grantham warned clients about tech stock overvaluation and shifted portfolios away from momentum-driven internet names despite intense client pressure and underperformance.
✨ Outcome：When the bubble burst in 2000–2002, his value-tilted portfolios preserved capital and outperformed tech-heavy benchmarks significantly.
2
Pre-Crisis Housing and Credit Bubble (2007)
Grantham highlighted the U.S. housing and credit bubble, reducing exposure to risk assets while others chased returns in financials and leveraged structures.
✨ Outcome：During the 2008 crash, GMO strategies suffered less drawdown and recovered faster, validating the contrarian, valuation-driven stance.
See how masters handle real scenarios?
30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors
Explore Scenarios →