Deserve What You Want - AI Analysis Prompt
Use this Charlie Munger rule prompt to apply “Deserve What You Want” to a specific company. It turns a vague opinion into a repeatable checklist: what facts you must verify, which assumptions matter most, what would invalidate the thesis, and the common misreads that create false certainty. Expect a written output you can save: a thesis summary, key risks, and next-step questions for filings and earnings calls. If a claim matters, require primary-source citations before you act. Educational only — not investment advice.
Full Prompt
You are an investment analyst trained in Charlie Munger's principle of "Deserve What You Want." Your core philosophy: mental models, multi-disciplinary thinking, inversion. Your task is to analyze {Company Name} through the specific lens of this principle.
## Context
Charlie Munger teaches: "The best way to get what you want is to deserve what you want."
## Analysis Framework
### 1. Principle Application Assessment
- How does this principle specifically apply to {Company Name}?
- What aspects of the company are most relevant to "Deserve What You Want"?
- Rate the company's alignment with this principle: Strong / Moderate / Weak
- What would Charlie Munger focus on first when evaluating this company?
### 2. Quantitative Evidence
- Identify 3-5 key financial metrics most relevant to this principle
- Analyze these metrics over the past 5-10 years for {Company Name}
- Compare with industry peers and historical benchmarks
- Are the numbers improving, stable, or deteriorating?
- What story do the numbers tell through the lens of "Deserve What You Want"?
### 3. Qualitative Deep Dive
- Evaluate the non-quantifiable factors Charlie Munger would examine
- Management quality and alignment with this principle
- Industry dynamics and competitive position
- Business model sustainability viewed through this specific lens
- What would Charlie Munger want to know that isn't in the financial statements?
### 4. Risk Assessment Through This Lens
- What risks does this principle specifically highlight for {Company Name}?
- What could go wrong that this principle is designed to protect against?
- Are there warning signs that Charlie Munger would flag?
- Stress-test: How would this company perform under adverse conditions?
- What is the worst-case scenario from this principle's perspective?
### 5. Opportunity Identification
- What opportunities does analyzing through this lens reveal?
- Are there hidden strengths the market may be undervaluing?
- How does this company compare to Charlie Munger's ideal investment?
- What catalysts could unlock value related to this principle?
### 6. Munger Verdict
- Summarize: Does {Company Name} pass the "Deserve What You Want" test?
- Rate the investment opportunity: 1-10 from this principle's perspective
- Clear recommendation: Buy / Hold / Avoid (based on this principle alone)
- What conditions would change your assessment?
- One-paragraph summary capturing Charlie Munger's likely assessment
## Output Format
Present your analysis with specific data points in each section. Use Charlie Munger's analytical style: multi-disciplinary analysis using mental models from psychology, economics, and biology. End with a decisive verdict.Related reading (close the loop)
Pick one path below to turn the output into a checkable, repeatable decision policy.
- Read the matching principleDefinition, boundaries, pitfalls, and a minimal checklist.
- Master profileMethodology summary + common misreads for this framework.
- Practice in scenariosTranslate conclusions into “what I do under stress”.
- More prompts from this masterTriangulate with multiple rules instead of anchoring on one prompt.
Educational only. Verify facts with primary sources and apply your own constraints.
Basic Questions
What does Munger's 'deserve what you want' specifically mean for investing?
This is Munger's most pragmatic life philosophy:
🎯 Core idea: To get something, first make yourself worthy of it
Investment applications:
1. Want high returns? First invest sufficient time in research and learning
2. Want to buy great companies? First develop the ability to identify them
3. Want successful bottom-fishing? First build adequate cash reserves and mental preparation
Munger opposes the 'something for nothing' mentality — those expecting shortcuts to wealth usually take the longest detours.
🎯 Core idea: To get something, first make yourself worthy of it
Investment applications:
1. Want high returns? First invest sufficient time in research and learning
2. Want to buy great companies? First develop the ability to identify them
3. Want successful bottom-fishing? First build adequate cash reserves and mental preparation
Munger opposes the 'something for nothing' mentality — those expecting shortcuts to wealth usually take the longest detours.
Usage Tips
Is the AI's 1-10 rating reliable?
⚠️ AI's "readiness score" helps you honestly assess whether you deserve the investment returns you want, not give false confidence.
How to interpret:
- **8-10 (well prepared)**: Your knowledge, analytical ability, and discipline reach the level needed for pursuing higher returns
- **5-7 (still developing)**: Good foundation but clear weaknesses — AI identifies areas needing improvement
- **1-4 (significant gap)**: Notable gap between current ability and target returns — lower expectations or invest time in learning first
Munger said: The best way to get what you want is to deserve it. In investing, this means continuous learning and improving analytical ability, not relying on luck or following the crowd.
How to interpret:
- **8-10 (well prepared)**: Your knowledge, analytical ability, and discipline reach the level needed for pursuing higher returns
- **5-7 (still developing)**: Good foundation but clear weaknesses — AI identifies areas needing improvement
- **1-4 (significant gap)**: Notable gap between current ability and target returns — lower expectations or invest time in learning first
Munger said: The best way to get what you want is to deserve it. In investing, this means continuous learning and improving analytical ability, not relying on luck or following the crowd.
Getting started
Does this prompt give investment advice or buy/sell calls?
No. It is a research helper that turns your thinking into checkable inputs and constraints: what evidence you must verify, what would prove the thesis wrong, and what common misreads to avoid. Treat the output as a draft, not a signal. Validate every material number against primary sources (filings, earnings releases, investor presentations, transcripts), and do not act unless you can write down (1) position-size limits and (2) explicit invalidation triggers.
What inputs should I provide for a reliable result?
At minimum: a 1-sentence business model summary, your current thesis (why it wins/loses), time horizon, and risk constraints; a valuation/price range; and the latest financial statements (profit quality, cash flow, debt/liquidity). Add context that reduces hallucinations: the exact filing period, known one-offs, key competitors, and what you do NOT know yet. If an input is missing, label it as missing evidence instead of letting the model guess.
Validation and boundaries
How do I validate the output?
Validate falsifiable claims one by one. Rewrite each key statement into something you can check: the metric, the period, and the source. Numbers must match filings; management claims must be traceable to transcripts/guidance; and “moat” claims need observable evidence (pricing power, retention, switching costs, cost structure). Anything you cannot verify becomes a follow-up task, not a decision trigger. If the model cites dates, confirm they are not beyond its knowledge cutoff.
When should I NOT act on the output?
If you cannot write down invalidation triggers, a position-size cap, or primary-source evidence for the key claims behind “Deserve What You Want”, do not act. The safer move is usually to reduce size, slow down, and schedule the next review.
More Rule Prompts
Explore other investment principles from this master.
Stay Curious
Nothing has served me better in my long life than continuous curiosity.
→Reputation is Invaluable
It takes 20 years to build a reputation and 5 minutes to ruin it.
→Avoid Self-Pity
Self-pity is always counterproductive.
→Lifelong Learning
In my whole life, I have known no wise people who didn't read all the time.
→