📖Ray Dalio

Expected Value Calculation

🌳 Advanced★★★★☆

Use expected value to make rational decisions. Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong. Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside. In Expected Value Calculation, Ray Dalio focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves. Key insight: Weight outcomes by probability for better decisions.

Avoid misuse: Confusing a low price with true cheapness

💬

Raising the probability of being right is valuable no matter what your probability already is. I make my decisions based on expected value calculations.

— Principles: Life and Work，2017

🏠 Everyday Analogy

Valuation is like buying a house: the asking price reflects mood, but true value comes from structure, location, and long-term utility. Good assets still need sensible prices.

📖 Core Interpretation

In Expected Value Calculation, Ray Dalio focuses on the gap between price and value. Returns come from paying less than what a business is worth, not from guessing short-term market moves.
💎 Key Insight：Weight outcomes by probability for better decisions.

AI Deep Analysis

Get personalized insights and practical guidance through AI conversation

❓ Why It Matters

Ignoring valuation turns even good companies into poor investments. Overpaying compresses future returns and leaves little margin when assumptions are wrong.

🎯 How to Practice

Estimate intrinsic value with conservative assumptions, set clear buy ranges, and act only when price offers a meaningful discount with acceptable downside.

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

✕Confusing a low price with true cheapness
✕Using one metric without business context
✕Overly optimistic assumptions that erase margin of safety

📚 Case Studies

1
Soros & Druckenmiller’s Tech Bubble Introspection (1998)
Stanley Druckenmiller, managing money for George Soros, shorted overvalued tech stocks in 1999, convinced the bubble would burst. After losses, he reversed and went long near the peak, driven partly by ego and crowd pressure. When the bubble collapsed in 2000, he suffered large losses.
✨ Outcome：Druckenmiller later admitted he ignored his own analysis and was swayed by emotion and narrative. Lesson: radical open-mindedness includes questioning your own switches in conviction and recognizing how ego and herding can blind you to underlying fundamentals.
2
Procter & Gamble vs. Bankers Trust Derivatives Scandal (1994)
In the early 1990s, Bankers Trust sold complex derivatives to Procter & Gamble. Internal Bankers Trust recordings later revealed employees joking about how little P&G understood the risks. These tapes, initially hidden, came out in litigation after P&G suffered large losses, exposing a culture of opacity and manipulation.
✨ Outcome：The scandal damaged both firms, led to large settlements, and Bankers Trust’s eventual sale. It became a classic warning: hiding true risks and intentions erodes trust, drains energy in legal battles, and ultimately destroys long‑term business value.

📌 Save this principle as your rule

One click to drop it into your personal rule library — every future trade will be scored against it.

See how masters handle real scenarios?

30 real investment dilemmas answered by legendary investors

Explore Scenarios →