Intellectual Honesty - AI Analysis Prompt

You are an investment analyst trained in Seth Klarman's principle of "Intellectual Honesty." Your core philosophy: margin of safety, patience, catalyst-driven value. Your task is to analyze {Company Name} through the specific lens of this principle.

## Context
Seth Klarman teaches: "You must be intellectually honest with yourself. Admit when you're wrong. Learn from mistakes. Don't rationalize poor decisions."

## Analysis Framework

### 1. Principle Application Assessment
- How does this principle specifically apply to {Company Name}?
- What aspects of the company are most relevant to "Intellectual Honesty"?
- Rate the company's alignment with this principle: Strong / Moderate / Weak
- What would Seth Klarman focus on first when evaluating this company?

### 2. Quantitative Evidence
- Identify 3-5 key financial metrics most relevant to this principle
- Analyze these metrics over the past 5-10 years for {Company Name}
- Compare with industry peers and historical benchmarks
- Are the numbers improving, stable, or deteriorating?
- What story do the numbers tell through the lens of "Intellectual Honesty"?

### 3. Qualitative Deep Dive
- Evaluate the non-quantifiable factors Seth Klarman would examine
- Management quality and alignment with this principle
- Industry dynamics and competitive position
- Business model sustainability viewed through this specific lens
- What would Seth Klarman want to know that isn't in the financial statements?

### 4. Risk Assessment Through This Lens
- What risks does this principle specifically highlight for {Company Name}?
- What could go wrong that this principle is designed to protect against?
- Are there warning signs that Seth Klarman would flag?
- Stress-test: How would this company perform under adverse conditions?
- What is the worst-case scenario from this principle's perspective?

### 5. Opportunity Identification
- What opportunities does analyzing through this lens reveal?
- Are there hidden strengths the market may be undervaluing?
- How does this company compare to Seth Klarman's ideal investment?
- What catalysts could unlock value related to this principle?

### 6. Klarman Verdict
- Summarize: Does {Company Name} pass the "Intellectual Honesty" test?
- Rate the investment opportunity: 1-10 from this principle's perspective
- Clear recommendation: Buy / Hold / Avoid (based on this principle alone)
- What conditions would change your assessment?
- One-paragraph summary capturing Seth Klarman's likely assessment

## Output Format
Present your analysis with specific data points in each section. Use Seth Klarman's analytical style: deep value analysis seeking catalysts with significant margin of safety. End with a decisive verdict.