What the Masters Would Say
The choice between ETFs and mutual funds is one of the most practical investment decisions that most investors will face, yet it is surrounded by more confusion than it deserves. The truth is that the difference between the two vehicles is far less important than the investment strategy they implement. A low-cost index ETF and a low-cost index mutual fund tracking the same index will produce virtually identical returns over time.
Warren Buffett has been remarkably specific in his recommendation for most investors: buy a low-cost S&P 500 index fund. In his 2013 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, he instructed the trustee of his estate to invest 90% of his wife's inheritance in a "very low-cost S&P 500 index fund." He specifically recommended the Vanguard fund. Whether this fund is structured as an ETF or a mutual fund is, in Buffett's framework, a secondary consideration to the cost and strategy.
The key differences between ETFs and mutual funds are structural rather than strategic. ETFs trade on stock exchanges like individual stocks, meaning you can buy and sell them throughout the trading day at market prices. Mutual funds are bought and sold directly from the fund company at the end-of-day net asset value (NAV). For long-term investors, this intraday trading ability is irrelevant and can actually be harmful by encouraging overtrading.
Charlie Munger would focus on what matters most: total cost. The expense ratio -- the annual fee charged by the fund -- has the most significant impact on long-term returns. A difference of just 0.5% in annual fees can reduce your final wealth by 10-15% over 30 years. Both ETFs and mutual funds are available with extremely low expense ratios (0.03-0.10%), so the vehicle type matters less than choosing the lowest-cost option available to you.
Tax efficiency is one area where ETFs have a genuine structural advantage for taxable accounts. Due to the "in-kind creation/redemption" mechanism, ETFs typically generate fewer capital gains distributions than mutual funds. This means ETF investors in taxable accounts pay less in annual taxes, which compounds over time. However, this advantage disappears in tax-advantaged accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs, where capital gains distributions have no tax impact.
For investors using employer-sponsored retirement plans like 401(k)s, the choice is often made for you -- most 401(k) plans offer mutual funds rather than ETFs. This is perfectly fine. The important thing is to select the lowest-cost index fund available in your plan, regardless of whether it is structured as an ETF or mutual fund. John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard and the inventor of the index fund, actually preferred traditional mutual funds over ETFs because they discourage frequent trading.
Your Action Plan
The Bottom Line
The most important decision is not ETF vs mutual fund -- it is investing vs not investing. Any low-cost, diversified index fund is an excellent choice regardless of its structure.
Citation Traceability
- Canonical URL: https://keeprule.com/en/scenarios/etf-vs-mutual-fund-which-should-i-choose
- Language Served: en (requested: en)
- Last Updated: 2026-02-12
Want Deeper Analysis?
Copy this scenario as an AI prompt. Paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for personalized analysis
Explore More Scenarios
Browse all 30 investing dilemmas and discover what legendary investors would do in each situation.
View All Scenarios