Defense First - Prompt de Análisis IA
Use this Paul Tudor Jones rule prompt to apply “Defense First” to a specific company. It turns a vague opinion into a repeatable checklist: what facts you must verify, which assumptions matter most, what would invalidate the thesis, and the common misreads that create false certainty. Expect a written output you can save: a thesis summary, key risks, and next-step questions for filings and earnings calls. If a claim matters, require primary-source citations before you act. Educational only — not investment advice.
Prompt completo
Eres un analista de inversiones entrenado en el principio de Paul Tudor Jones: "Defense First". Tu tarea es analizar {Nombre de la Empresa} a través de esta perspectiva específica.
## Contexto
Paul Tudor Jones enseña: "Dont focus on making money; focus on protecting what you have. Playing great defense means youll be around to play offense."
## Marco de Análisis
### 1. Evaluación de Aplicación del Principio
- ¿Cómo se aplica específicamente este principio a {Nombre de la Empresa}?
- ¿Qué aspectos de la empresa son más relevantes para "Defense First"?
- Califica la alineación: Fuerte / Moderada / Débil
- ¿En qué se enfocaría Paul Tudor Jones primero?
### 2. Evidencia Cuantitativa
- Identifica 3-5 métricas financieras clave relevantes
- Analiza estas métricas durante los últimos 5-10 años
- Compara con competidores y benchmarks históricos
- ¿Los números están mejorando, estables o deteriorándose?
### 3. Análisis Cualitativo
- Evalúa factores no cuantificables que Paul Tudor Jones examinaría
- Calidad de la gestión y alineación con este principio
- Dinámica de la industria y posición competitiva
- Sostenibilidad del modelo de negocio desde esta perspectiva
### 4. Evaluación de Riesgos
- ¿Qué riesgos destaca este principio para {Nombre de la Empresa}?
- ¿Qué señales de advertencia identificaría Paul Tudor Jones?
- Prueba de estrés: ¿Cómo se desempeñaría bajo condiciones adversas?
- ¿Cuál es el peor escenario desde esta perspectiva?
### 5. Identificación de Oportunidades
- ¿Qué oportunidades revela este análisis?
- ¿Hay fortalezas ocultas que el mercado podría estar subvalorando?
- ¿Qué catalizadores podrían liberar valor?
### 6. Tudor Jones Verdict
- ¿{Nombre de la Empresa} pasa la prueba de "Defense First"?
- Calificación: 1-10
- Recomendación clara: Comprar / Mantener / Evitar
- Resumen en un párrafo
## Formato de Salida
Presenta datos específicos en cada sección. Termina con un veredicto decisivo.Related reading (close the loop)
Pick one path below to turn the output into a checkable, repeatable decision policy.
- Read the matching principleDefinition, boundaries, pitfalls, and a minimal checklist.
- Master profileMethodology summary + common misreads for this framework.
- Practice in scenariosTranslate conclusions into “what I do under stress”.
- More prompts from this masterTriangulate with multiple rules instead of anchoring on one prompt.
Educational only. Verify facts with primary sources and apply your own constraints.
Este contenido solo está disponible en chino e inglés por el momento.
Basic Questions
How to execute the 'defense first' trading philosophy in practice?
Core idea: defense first — controlling losses is more important than chasing profits
✅ Using this AI prompt, you can systematically analyze any company or investment opportunity from this principle's perspective.
The prompt guides you to:
1. Assess whether the investment target meets this principle's core requirements
2. Identify key risks and blind spots
3. Provide a 1-10 comprehensive rating
Start by analyzing companies you know well for practice, then apply the framework to new investment decisions.
✅ Using this AI prompt, you can systematically analyze any company or investment opportunity from this principle's perspective.
The prompt guides you to:
1. Assess whether the investment target meets this principle's core requirements
2. Identify key risks and blind spots
3. Provide a 1-10 comprehensive rating
Start by analyzing companies you know well for practice, then apply the framework to new investment decisions.
Usage Tips
Is the AI's downside risk assessment reliable?
⚠️ AI risk assessment is a useful starting point but cannot replace strict risk management discipline.
Value:
- Systematically identifies overlooked risk factors (liquidity risk, correlation risk)
- Quantifies potential losses under different stop-loss strategies
- Builds a clear "worst-case scenario" framework
Limitations:
- Cannot predict sudden events (flash crashes, policy shocks)
- Historical backtesting doesn't guarantee future performance
- Jones's "intuition" and "market feel" cannot be replicated by AI
✅ Best approach: Use AI risk analysis as a "checklist" for your defense system, but set stop-loss discipline in advance and execute strictly.
Value:
- Systematically identifies overlooked risk factors (liquidity risk, correlation risk)
- Quantifies potential losses under different stop-loss strategies
- Builds a clear "worst-case scenario" framework
Limitations:
- Cannot predict sudden events (flash crashes, policy shocks)
- Historical backtesting doesn't guarantee future performance
- Jones's "intuition" and "market feel" cannot be replicated by AI
✅ Best approach: Use AI risk analysis as a "checklist" for your defense system, but set stop-loss discipline in advance and execute strictly.
Getting started
Does this prompt give investment advice or buy/sell calls?
No. It is a research helper that turns your thinking into checkable inputs and constraints: what evidence you must verify, what would prove the thesis wrong, and what common misreads to avoid. Treat the output as a draft, not a signal. Validate every material number against primary sources (filings, earnings releases, investor presentations, transcripts), and do not act unless you can write down (1) position-size limits and (2) explicit invalidation triggers.
What inputs should I provide for a reliable result?
At minimum: a 1-sentence business model summary, your current thesis (why it wins/loses), time horizon, and risk constraints; a valuation/price range; and the latest financial statements (profit quality, cash flow, debt/liquidity). Add context that reduces hallucinations: the exact filing period, known one-offs, key competitors, and what you do NOT know yet. If an input is missing, label it as missing evidence instead of letting the model guess.
Validation and boundaries
How do I validate the output?
Validate falsifiable claims one by one. Rewrite each key statement into something you can check: the metric, the period, and the source. Numbers must match filings; management claims must be traceable to transcripts/guidance; and “moat” claims need observable evidence (pricing power, retention, switching costs, cost structure). Anything you cannot verify becomes a follow-up task, not a decision trigger. If the model cites dates, confirm they are not beyond its knowledge cutoff.
When should I NOT act on the output?
If you cannot write down invalidation triggers, a position-size cap, or primary-source evidence for the key claims behind “Defense First”, do not act. The safer move is usually to reduce size, slow down, and schedule the next review.
Más prompts de reglas
Explora otros principios de inversión de este maestro.
Control Your Emotions
Every day I assume every position I have is wrong. This removes the ego from trading. Never fall in love with a position.
→Timing Matters
Being right about direction is not enough; you must be right about timing. A great idea at the wrong time is a losing trade.
→Price Action is Truth
At the end of the day, the market tells you whether youre right or wrong. Listen to price action, not your thesis.
→Asymmetric Bets
Look for trades where the upside is many times the downside. 5:1 reward-to-risk ratios mean you can be wrong most of the time and still profit.
→