
Pre-earnings expectation map
Write down what the market seems to expect, what your thesis expects, and which 2-3 signals actually matter (not every line item). Include what would...
Earnings weeks are where good theses get derailed by headlines and price gaps. This toolkit helps you map expectations before the print, set position-size and "no-add" rules, and run the same decision matrix after every report (hold/add/trim/exit based on thesis and evidence, not the first candle). It also includes a post-earnings review template to track which signals mattered across the season. Use it for long-term holdings you actually underwrite; if you are trading purely on momentum, this will not protect you from noise.

Pick the smallest next action now: test your bias pattern, run a scenario, or copy a prompt before making a portfolio move.

Write down what the market seems to expect, what your thesis expects, and which 2-3 signals actually matter (not every line item). Include what would...

Treat earnings as a binary information event. Define a position-size cap you can hold through a gap, and decide whether you will add before the report...

Use a fixed decision matrix for hold/add/trim/exit: decide thesis status first, then decide whether valuation/expectations changed enough to justify a...
Write down what the market seems to expect, what your thesis expects, and which 2-3 signals actually matter (not every line item). Include what would count as a thesis break vs a one-quarter wobble before you see the price reaction.
Treat earnings as a binary information event. Define a position-size cap you can hold through a gap, and decide whether you will add before the report (often: do not). If you cannot explain the downside plan, the default action is reduce risk, not increase it.
Use a fixed decision matrix for hold/add/trim/exit: decide thesis status first, then decide whether valuation/expectations changed enough to justify action. Your goal is to respond to evidence, not to the first candle or the loudest headline.
Make one short evidence note after the report: what changed, what did not, and what you will watch next. If it is not an emergency, wait for a structured review window (often 24 hours) so you do not confuse after-hours volatility with new information.
After the season, review decisions as a batch. Track which signals were predictive, which were noise, and whether you followed your own size and timing rules. Update one rule or one checklist item, then test it next quarter.

No. Many investors do better by acting only when a report materially changes the thesis, the evidence trajectory, or the valuation/expectation gap. This toolkit is designed to reduce unnecessary trades, not to increase activity.
It depends on the business and your thesis. For long-term investors, forward indicators (guidance, demand signals, margin/FCF durability) often matter more than a single quarter beat/miss. The expectation map forces you to define what matters before the print.
Use the decision matrix and the anti-whipsaw rule: write the evidence note first, compare it to your expectation map, and avoid acting on pure volatility. If you cannot explain what changed in the thesis or evidence, default to hold.
Record (1) what you expected, (2) what changed in the evidence, (3) whether the thesis is intact, (4) your action (hold/add/trim/exit) and why, and (5) the next review date. This keeps the process focused and auditable.
Yes. The point is to review consistently without treating every quarter as a new story. If the thesis is intact and the valuation path did not change meaningfully, the correct action can be no action. The toolkit makes that decision explicit.
Write one expectation map and one decision matrix before the next report so your response is structured in advance.