Circle of Competence - AI Analysis Prompt

Use this Warren Buffett rule prompt to apply “Circle of Competence” to a specific company. It turns a vague opinion into a repeatable checklist: what facts you must verify, which assumptions matter most, what would invalidate the thesis, and the common misreads that create false certainty. Expect a written output you can save: a thesis summary, key risks, and next-step questions for filings and earnings calls. If a claim matters, require primary-source citations before you act. Educational only — not investment advice.

Full Prompt

You are an investment clarity analyst trained in Warren Buffett's "Circle of Competence" principle. Your task is to help an investor determine whether {Company Name} falls within their circle of competence and whether the business is truly understandable.
## Analysis Framework
### 1. Business Model Transparency
- Can you explain how this company makes money in one paragraph?
- What are the top 3 revenue streams and their percentages?
- Is the business model straightforward or complex?
- How many steps are there between the product and the end customer?
- Are there hidden revenue dependencies (e.g., regulatory, subsidy-driven)?
### 2. Predictability Assessment
- Can you reasonably estimate revenue and earnings 5 years from now?
- How stable are revenues? (Coefficient of variation over 10 years)
- Are earnings driven by predictable demand or cyclical/project-based?
- Does the company have recurring revenue or long-term contracts?
- Rate the predictability: High / Medium / Low
### 3. Industry Understandability
- How well do you understand the industry dynamics?
- Can you name the top 5 competitors and their market shares?
- What drives demand in this industry?
- What are the key success factors?
- Are there technical aspects you cannot evaluate (e.g., biotech, semiconductors)?
### 4. Key Risks You Can vs. Cannot Assess
- List risks you understand well and can monitor
- List risks that are beyond your expertise to evaluate
- Are the critical risks assessable or opaque?
- Does the company rely on technologies you don't understand?
- Are there regulatory or geopolitical risks that are hard to predict?
### 5. Information Advantage Check
- Do you have any edge in understanding this business?
- Are you a customer, employee, or industry participant?
- Can you access meaningful information beyond Wall Street research?
- Are the financial statements clear and auditable?
- Does management communicate transparently?
### 6. Circle of Competence Verdict
- Does this company fall within a typical investor's circle of competence?
- What knowledge gaps exist?
- Recommendation: Invest / Study More / Stay Away
- What would someone need to learn before investing confidently?
- Suggested resources for expanding competence in this area
## Output Format
Be honest about uncertainty. End with a "Know What You Know" summary.

Related reading (close the loop)

Pick one path below to turn the output into a checkable, repeatable decision policy.

Educational only. Verify facts with primary sources and apply your own constraints.

Basic Questions

What is "Circle of Competence" and why does it matter?
Circle of competence refers to areas you truly understand — not "heard of" but "can predict outcomes."

Buffett avoided tech stocks for decades, not because tech was bad, but because he admitted he "couldn't understand" them.

Why it matters:
1. Within your circle, you can identify opportunities and risks others miss
2. Outside your circle, you're relying on luck
3. Most investor losses come from investing in things they don't understand

Buffett says: "Knowing what you know and knowing what you don't know — that is true knowledge."

Usage Tips

Any special advice for industry professionals?
If you work in a particular industry, you have a huge advantage:

✅ You can evaluate product quality and competitive landscape
✅ You understand real customer pain points and stickiness
✅ You can sense industry trend changes
✅ You know industry insiders and have information channels

⚠️ But there are traps too:
- Overconfidence ("I know this industry best")
- Emotional bias (favoring companies in your industry)
- Compliance risks with inside information

When using this prompt, provide your industry knowledge as additional input to AI for more precise analysis.

Getting started

Does this prompt give investment advice or buy/sell calls?
No. It is a research helper that turns your thinking into checkable inputs and constraints: what evidence you must verify, what would prove the thesis wrong, and what common misreads to avoid. Treat the output as a draft, not a signal. Validate every material number against primary sources (filings, earnings releases, investor presentations, transcripts), and do not act unless you can write down (1) position-size limits and (2) explicit invalidation triggers.
What inputs should I provide for a reliable result?
At minimum: a 1-sentence business model summary, your current thesis (why it wins/loses), time horizon, and risk constraints; a valuation/price range; and the latest financial statements (profit quality, cash flow, debt/liquidity). Add context that reduces hallucinations: the exact filing period, known one-offs, key competitors, and what you do NOT know yet. If an input is missing, label it as missing evidence instead of letting the model guess.

Validation and boundaries

How do I validate the output?
Validate falsifiable claims one by one. Rewrite each key statement into something you can check: the metric, the period, and the source. Numbers must match filings; management claims must be traceable to transcripts/guidance; and “moat” claims need observable evidence (pricing power, retention, switching costs, cost structure). Anything you cannot verify becomes a follow-up task, not a decision trigger. If the model cites dates, confirm they are not beyond its knowledge cutoff.
When should I NOT act on the output?
If you cannot write down invalidation triggers, a position-size cap, or primary-source evidence for the key claims behind “Circle of Competence”, do not act. The safer move is usually to reduce size, slow down, and schedule the next review.

More Rule Prompts

Explore other investment principles from this master.