Wonderful Company at Fair Price - AI Analysis Prompt

Use this Warren Buffett rule prompt to apply “Wonderful Company at Fair Price” to a specific company. It turns a vague opinion into a repeatable checklist: what facts you must verify, which assumptions matter most, what would invalidate the thesis, and the common misreads that create false certainty. Expect a written output you can save: a thesis summary, key risks, and next-step questions for filings and earnings calls. If a claim matters, require primary-source citations before you act. Educational only — not investment advice.

Full Prompt

You are a quality-focused investment analyst trained in Warren Buffett's principle of buying "a wonderful company at a fair price." Your task is to evaluate whether {Company Name} qualifies as a wonderful company and whether its current price is fair.
## Analysis Framework
### 1. Economic Moat Assessment
- What is the company's competitive advantage? (Brand, patents, network effects, switching costs, cost advantages)
- How wide is the moat? Rate it: None / Narrow / Wide
- Is the moat getting wider or narrower over time?
- Can competitors replicate this advantage within 5 years?
- What would it cost to build this business from scratch?
### 2. Business Quality Metrics
- Return on Equity (ROE) over the past 10 years — is it consistently above 15%?
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) vs. Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
- Gross margins and operating margins — are they stable or improving?
- Free cash flow conversion rate (FCF / Net Income)
- Revenue predictability and recurring revenue percentage
### 3. Pricing Power Test
- Can the company raise prices without losing customers?
- Evidence of pricing power in the last 5 years
- How does the company perform during inflationary periods?
- Customer dependency and brand loyalty indicators
- Market share trends over the past decade
### 4. Growth Quality Assessment
- Is growth organic or acquisition-driven?
- Reinvestment rate and return on incremental capital
- Total addressable market (TAM) and penetration rate
- International expansion opportunities
- Is the company a "compounding machine"?
### 5. Fair Price Determination
- Current P/E ratio vs. 10-year average and industry median
- PEG ratio analysis
- Owner earnings yield (Buffett's preferred metric)
- What price would represent a "fair" price for this wonderful company?
- Compare current price to your fair value estimate
### 6. Verdict: Wonderful Company at Fair Price?
- Is this truly a wonderful company? (Yes/No with evidence)
- Is the current price fair, overvalued, or undervalued?
- Would Buffett add this to his portfolio today?
- Long-term holding potential: 10+ years?
## Output Format
Structure your response with clear data-driven sections. End with a "Buffett Verdict" paragraph.

Related reading (close the loop)

Pick one path below to turn the output into a checkable, repeatable decision policy.

Educational only. Verify facts with primary sources and apply your own constraints.

Basic Questions

How is "fair price" defined? Isn't cheaper always better?
This is the key evolution from Graham to modern Buffett:

Graham (early Buffett): Buy mediocre companies at extremely low prices ("cigar butts")
Buffett (now): Buy wonderful companies at fair prices

"Fair price" means:
- You don't need a deep discount (below 50%), 70-80% of intrinsic value is fine
- The key is that company quality is good enough that long-term compounding overcomes the valuation premium
- A company with 25% ROE, even bought at 15x PE, will far outperform a company with 8% ROE bought at 8x PE over the long term

Usage Tips

How to use this prompt to screen companies?
Three-step approach recommended:

Step 1: Quick Screen (5 minutes)
Use financial websites to filter for companies with ROE>15%, gross margins>40%

Step 2: Moat Assessment (use this prompt)
Run the prompt on screened companies, focusing on "Economic Moat Assessment" and "Pricing Power Test" sections

Step 3: Valuation Check
Focus on the "Fair Price Determination" section, confirm current price isn't significantly overvalued

⚠️ Don't analyze too many companies at once — deep analysis of 3-5 companies is more valuable than shallow analysis of 20

Getting started

Does this prompt give investment advice or buy/sell calls?
No. It is a research helper that turns your thinking into checkable inputs and constraints: what evidence you must verify, what would prove the thesis wrong, and what common misreads to avoid. Treat the output as a draft, not a signal. Validate every material number against primary sources (filings, earnings releases, investor presentations, transcripts), and do not act unless you can write down (1) position-size limits and (2) explicit invalidation triggers.
What inputs should I provide for a reliable result?
At minimum: a 1-sentence business model summary, your current thesis (why it wins/loses), time horizon, and risk constraints; a valuation/price range; and the latest financial statements (profit quality, cash flow, debt/liquidity). Add context that reduces hallucinations: the exact filing period, known one-offs, key competitors, and what you do NOT know yet. If an input is missing, label it as missing evidence instead of letting the model guess.

Validation and boundaries

How do I validate the output?
Validate falsifiable claims one by one. Rewrite each key statement into something you can check: the metric, the period, and the source. Numbers must match filings; management claims must be traceable to transcripts/guidance; and “moat” claims need observable evidence (pricing power, retention, switching costs, cost structure). Anything you cannot verify becomes a follow-up task, not a decision trigger. If the model cites dates, confirm they are not beyond its knowledge cutoff.
When should I NOT act on the output?
If you cannot write down invalidation triggers, a position-size cap, or primary-source evidence for the key claims behind “Wonderful Company at Fair Price”, do not act. The safer move is usually to reduce size, slow down, and schedule the next review.

More Rule Prompts

Explore other investment principles from this master.