Deserve What You Want - Prompt d'Analyse IA
Use this Charlie Munger rule prompt to apply “Méritez ce que Vous Voulez” to a specific company. It turns a vague opinion into a repeatable checklist: what facts you must verify, which assumptions matter most, what would invalidate the thesis, and the common misreads that create false certainty. Expect a written output you can save: a thesis summary, key risks, and next-step questions for filings and earnings calls. If a claim matters, require primary-source citations before you act. Educational only — not investment advice.
Prompt Complet
Vous êtes un analyste d'investissement formé au principe de Charlie Munger : « Deserve What You Want ». Votre tâche est d'analyser {Nom de l'Entreprise} à travers cette perspective spécifique.
## Contexte
Charlie Munger enseigne : « The best way to get what you want is to deserve what you want. »
## Cadre d'Analyse
### 1. Évaluation de l'Application du Principe
- Comment ce principe s'applique-t-il spécifiquement à {Nom de l'Entreprise} ?
- Quels aspects de l'entreprise sont les plus pertinents pour « Deserve What You Want » ?
- Évaluez l'alignement : Fort / Modéré / Faible
- Sur quoi Charlie Munger se concentrerait-il en premier ?
### 2. Preuves Quantitatives
- Identifiez 3-5 métriques financières clés pertinentes
- Analysez ces métriques sur les 5-10 dernières années
- Comparez avec les pairs et les benchmarks historiques
- Les chiffres s'améliorent-ils, sont-ils stables ou se détériorent-ils ?
### 3. Analyse Qualitative
- Évaluez les facteurs non quantifiables que Charlie Munger examinerait
- Qualité de la gestion et alignement avec ce principe
- Dynamique de l'industrie et position concurrentielle
- Durabilité du modèle d'affaires selon cette perspective
### 4. Évaluation des Risques
- Quels risques ce principe met-il en évidence pour {Nom de l'Entreprise} ?
- Quels signaux d'alarme Charlie Munger identifierait-il ?
- Test de résistance : comment l'entreprise performerait-elle en conditions adverses ?
- Quel est le pire scénario selon cette perspective ?
### 5. Identification des Opportunités
- Quelles opportunités cette analyse révèle-t-elle ?
- Y a-t-il des forces cachées sous-évaluées par le marché ?
- Quels catalyseurs pourraient libérer de la valeur ?
### 6. Munger Verdict
- {Nom de l'Entreprise} passe-t-elle le test de « Deserve What You Want » ?
- Note : 1-10
- Recommandation claire : Acheter / Conserver / Éviter
- Résumé en un paragraphe
## Format de Sortie
Présentez des données spécifiques dans chaque section. Terminez par un verdict décisif.Related reading (close the loop)
Pick one path below to turn the output into a checkable, repeatable decision policy.
- Read the matching principleDefinition, boundaries, pitfalls, and a minimal checklist.
- Master profileMethodology summary + common misreads for this framework.
- Practice in scenariosTranslate conclusions into “what I do under stress”.
- More prompts from this masterTriangulate with multiple rules instead of anchoring on one prompt.
Educational only. Verify facts with primary sources and apply your own constraints.
Ce contenu n'est disponible qu'en chinois et en anglais pour le moment.
Basic Questions
What does Munger's 'deserve what you want' specifically mean for investing?
This is Munger's most pragmatic life philosophy:
🎯 Core idea: To get something, first make yourself worthy of it
Investment applications:
1. Want high returns? First invest sufficient time in research and learning
2. Want to buy great companies? First develop the ability to identify them
3. Want successful bottom-fishing? First build adequate cash reserves and mental preparation
Munger opposes the 'something for nothing' mentality — those expecting shortcuts to wealth usually take the longest detours.
🎯 Core idea: To get something, first make yourself worthy of it
Investment applications:
1. Want high returns? First invest sufficient time in research and learning
2. Want to buy great companies? First develop the ability to identify them
3. Want successful bottom-fishing? First build adequate cash reserves and mental preparation
Munger opposes the 'something for nothing' mentality — those expecting shortcuts to wealth usually take the longest detours.
Usage Tips
Is the AI's 1-10 rating reliable?
⚠️ AI's "readiness score" helps you honestly assess whether you deserve the investment returns you want, not give false confidence.
How to interpret:
- **8-10 (well prepared)**: Your knowledge, analytical ability, and discipline reach the level needed for pursuing higher returns
- **5-7 (still developing)**: Good foundation but clear weaknesses — AI identifies areas needing improvement
- **1-4 (significant gap)**: Notable gap between current ability and target returns — lower expectations or invest time in learning first
Munger said: The best way to get what you want is to deserve it. In investing, this means continuous learning and improving analytical ability, not relying on luck or following the crowd.
How to interpret:
- **8-10 (well prepared)**: Your knowledge, analytical ability, and discipline reach the level needed for pursuing higher returns
- **5-7 (still developing)**: Good foundation but clear weaknesses — AI identifies areas needing improvement
- **1-4 (significant gap)**: Notable gap between current ability and target returns — lower expectations or invest time in learning first
Munger said: The best way to get what you want is to deserve it. In investing, this means continuous learning and improving analytical ability, not relying on luck or following the crowd.
Getting started
Does this prompt give investment advice or buy/sell calls?
No. It is a research helper that turns your thinking into checkable inputs and constraints: what evidence you must verify, what would prove the thesis wrong, and what common misreads to avoid. Treat the output as a draft, not a signal. Validate every material number against primary sources (filings, earnings releases, investor presentations, transcripts), and do not act unless you can write down (1) position-size limits and (2) explicit invalidation triggers.
What inputs should I provide for a reliable result?
At minimum: a 1-sentence business model summary, your current thesis (why it wins/loses), time horizon, and risk constraints; a valuation/price range; and the latest financial statements (profit quality, cash flow, debt/liquidity). Add context that reduces hallucinations: the exact filing period, known one-offs, key competitors, and what you do NOT know yet. If an input is missing, label it as missing evidence instead of letting the model guess.
Validation and boundaries
How do I validate the output?
Validate falsifiable claims one by one. Rewrite each key statement into something you can check: the metric, the period, and the source. Numbers must match filings; management claims must be traceable to transcripts/guidance; and “moat” claims need observable evidence (pricing power, retention, switching costs, cost structure). Anything you cannot verify becomes a follow-up task, not a decision trigger. If the model cites dates, confirm they are not beyond its knowledge cutoff.
When should I NOT act on the output?
If you cannot write down invalidation triggers, a position-size cap, or primary-source evidence for the key claims behind “Méritez ce que Vous Voulez”, do not act. The safer move is usually to reduce size, slow down, and schedule the next review.
Plus de Prompts de Règles
Explorez d'autres principes d'investissement de ce maître.
Restez Curieux
Rien ne m a mieux servi dans ma longue vie que la curiosité continue.
→La Réputation est Inestimable
Il faut 20 ans pour construire une réputation et 5 minutes pour la ruiner.
→Évitez l Apitoiement sur Soi
L apitoiement sur soi est toujours contre-productif.
→Apprentissage tout au long de la Vie
Dans toute ma vie, je n ai connu aucune personne sage qui ne lisait pas tout le temps.
→